|
|
Post by jabberwocky on Feb 26, 2005 0:46:37 GMT -5
Well i justr finisshed watching Enterprise, and I have to say that it is interesting that they explained why in ST TOS that they had Klingons that didn't have ridges.
|
|
|
|
Post by markus on Feb 27, 2005 8:27:12 GMT -5
I did not see this weeks ep ...what happened in it?...I will get a copy of it this week
|
|
|
|
Post by jabberwocky on Feb 27, 2005 14:57:52 GMT -5
Well first they saves the Enterprise by having her sister ship flied inverted and under Enterprise to extent Columbia's warp field to help stabilize long enough to get Trip to reboot the warp drive.
As for Phlox find a cure but he needed a week to test it. and the Klingons fleet sent to kill everything on the planet that he is on show in 3 days, To stop the Klingon fleet Phlox infects the Klingon fleet.
It turns out that the cure had the side effect of the cure was that they Klingons lost there ridges and looked human.
On a nother note of interest in DS9 we are intrduced to a covert-op group in the Federation, We sort of get a peek of them again.
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyTass2001 on Feb 27, 2005 22:52:16 GMT -5
So basically it took what 3-4 generations to revert back to what they were in TNG? now that is interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by jabberwocky on Feb 28, 2005 2:44:00 GMT -5
So basically it took what 3-4 generations to revert back to what they were in TNG? now that is interesting. Well they never did explain how come, for all we know is that. After all it is something that they do not talk about. |
|
|
|
Post by LadyTass2001 on Feb 28, 2005 12:03:25 GMT -5
Well that would be enough to cause alot of the problem's between the federation and the Klingons, I bet they felt we were doing genetic experiments on them, just think about what human's would be saying if something like that happened to them!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Vanguard the Newly Employed on Feb 28, 2005 12:15:47 GMT -5
That sounds pretty dumb. I mean, I wish they would have simply never brought up the issue in the first place. It's because the original Trek was low-budget (and wanted the villains to look like mongoloid communists), for Pete's sake!  |
|
|
|
Post by jabberwocky on Feb 28, 2005 17:00:58 GMT -5
That sounds pretty dumb. I mean, I wish they would have simply never brought up the issue in the first place. It's because the original Trek was low-budget (and wanted the villains to look like mongoloid communists), for Pete's sake! That is so true, but then I don't think that the show would have caught on to the point that it did. I also think that it wouldn't be the problem it is to day if it was not for the DS9 episode. |
|
|
|
Post by Nevermore on May 13, 2005 15:03:14 GMT -5
It all ends tonight for star trek a sad day indeed!  |
|
|
|
Post by ladytui on May 13, 2005 20:20:39 GMT -5
With so many shows airing their finales for the season, I don't think it will really sink in until fall when it doesn't return.  I will really miss Enterprise and Porthos - BEAGLES IN SPACE! |
|
|
|
Post by ladytui on May 15, 2005 15:21:22 GMT -5
When the show ended, I felt that more emphasis was placed on "The Next Generation" than on the end of "Enterprise". I found this part rather annoying considering we were supposed to be watching the end of "Enterprise". I guess in another aspect they were trying to say that "Enterprise" had a bearing on how they were handling situations in the future.
Troi talked about having to memorize the speech that Captain Archer gave, and yet we were not able to hear that speech. After the show was over, they had Captain Kirk, Pickard, and Archer each saying parts of the famous opening:
"Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds; to seek out new life and new civilizations; to boldly go where no man has gone before."
Do you think this means that the famous opening was actually part of Captain Archer's speech?
|
|
